Addict (noun) 1. a person who is addicted, especially to drugs, from the Latin ‘addictus’, to give one’s assent to.
--World English Dictionary
Philip Seymour Hoffman. He was perhaps the greatest actor of
his generation. An Academy Award winner.
A sensation on Broadway. A film director. Through his work in fifty movies and
numerous stage productions, Hoffman raised his art to high art. He was the kind of actor whose face we always
knew but whose name sometime escaped us, and yet, when he acted, when he was
onscreen or onstage, he mesmerized. He shone. He was amazing.
But now he’s gone.
Because Hoffman was also an addict. The details of the 46
year old actor’s death last Sunday are now widely known. Discovered in his New York City apartment, “Investigators [also]
found a syringe in his arm and, nearby, an envelope containing what appeared to
be heroin.” (from The New York Times). Hoffman left behind millions of
fans and most tragically, a partner of many years and three children.
I’m not sure why his death has hit me so hard but it has.
The wider culture is certainly in shock about it. Maybe it’s because his demise is such a
waste. How could one so talented, so idolized, so great at his craft, who
seemingly had “everything”, take the risk of sticking a needle in his arm to
get high?
How could one who had shared publically that he was clean
and sober for twenty three years relapse so quickly, go so far down, so
fast? How could one who must have been
aware of the dangers of heroin use, who knew of fellow artists who died from drug
addiction--Lenny Bruce, John Belushi, Chris Farley, Amy Winehouse, et al—ignore
this and still shoot up? How did he
become just another statistic, one of more than 38,000 Americans who will die
this year from drug overdoses, 75 percent from opioids like heroin?
He was an addict. That’s how he died. That’s why he died.
We need to name that truth even as we mourn Hoffman. Not to condemn or judge the man. As someone
who works very closely with addicts and has faced addiction, I know firsthand the
demons Hoffman must have wrestled with. I think the reason a death like
Hoffman’s is so shocking is that most people, non-addicts, 90 percent by some
estimates of the general population: they don’t understand what makes an addict
tick, or use, play with fire, have an addiction.
If any “good” could come from Hoffman’s death,
let it be that our nation take more seriously the huge social costs of
addiction and more important, begin to better understand the nature of
addiction.
Addicts don’t use just because
they want to or because they can. Addicts drink and drug because they have to;
because they are driven by a soul deep compulsion to fill a hole within, which
can seemingly never be repaired. Addicts drink and drug because they are
mentally ill, not because of moral failings or a lack of willpower. Addicts
drink and drug out of an insatiable physical need for a high and an unmet
spiritual need, an inability to see their own worth as humans, as children of
God.
Addicts are often some of the nicest people you will ever
meet. Addicts are not just the famous and well known like Hoffman, nor are they
merely stereotypes: the junkie in a cheap motel room, the wino weaving down the
street. Addicts are also our neighbors,
our sons and daughters, our spouses, our co-workers and our friends.
Ultimately addicts need our help and our compassion. Not condemnation. Not overly simplistic
platitudes like “Just Say No”. Addicts
need something more: some power greater than themselves and some care from
folks and society, to help them get and stay clean and sober, just one day at a
time.
God rest your soul Philip Seymour Hoffman. Actor. Partner. Father. Friend. Human. And
yes, addict.
Well said John. I've worked in the field of addiction since 1965 and your words ring true.
ReplyDeleteThank you David. Keep up the good work.
Delete