"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view, until you climb into his skin and walk around in it." --Atticus Finch, from “To Kill a Mockingbird”, by Harper Lee
What’s in a name?
Names define us as human beings, individually and
collectively. No name, no identity. No
clear understanding of who we are in the world.
When a baby is born the first act of the new parents is to name that
child, give them a clear moniker by which they will be known from that day
forward. Names matter. A lot. To imagine otherwise, that a name is
“just” a name, a mere word or a harmless descriptor seems to me either
incredibly naive or incredibly tone deaf.
Which brings me to the National Football League’s Washington
Redskins, based in our nation’s capitol.
The Redskins are under increasing pressure from Native Americans,
politicians, journalists, NFL players and even some fans to change their
name for one simple reason. “Redskin” is
an offensive, derogatory and racist term to large numbers of Native Americans,
who see it as an ugly stereotype at best, hate speech at worst.
Last week this debate intensified when the United States
Patent and Trademark Office cancelled the team’s five trademark registrations,
ruling that these violated the Lanham Act, a 1946 federal law prohibiting
trademarks that “may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons,
living or dead, institutions, beliefs.”
In other words the term “Redskin” and the symbols connected to it are
insulting to Native Americans.
But apparently Redskins’ ownership won’t budge on this
issue. In a widely quoted USA Today
article from a year ago, team owner Dan Snyder said, "We will never change
the name of the team....It's that simple. NEVER — you can use caps."
I’m not sure why Snyder and so many others still ignore the
hurtful and nasty reality of “Redskin” as a mean and even cruel term to Native
Americans. Is it about the money, profits associated with that pro team? Is it about tradition? This is just who we
are, always have been, always will be! Is it a backlash against so called “political
correctness”? Folks just need to get over it. It is just a name, right?
Yet would anyone cheer the use of other racial or ethnic
terms or skin colors to name a sports team? Can you or I imagine cheering for the
Baton Rouge Brownskins or the Seattle Yellowskins? How about the Jacksonville
Jews or the Boston Micks, a term derisive to Irish folks like me? I hope not. That’s not just acceptable. So why is it ok to give a social pass to names
which insult a whole group of Americans?
It’s not just the NFL which needs to look at this issue.
Hundreds of high school, college and pro teams across the U.S. still use
Native American names and mascots. Go to
an Atlanta Braves game and you get to do the tomahawk chop. Check out the image of “Chief Wahoo”, the
logo for baseball’s Cleveland Indians. And
yes, I know that when many of these team names were adopted long, long ago, it
may not have been done in a spirit of insult.
I get that.
But it is 2014. America has
changed. What once passed as “normal”
and socially acceptable racial and ethnic stereotypes: these are now taboo, and
rightfully so. Why this last holdout? This
final hanging on to a so-called “right” to names which so clearly are viewed by
fellow Americans as painful? There are 566 Native American tribes in the U.S. with 5.2
million members. Don’t they deserve some respect and dignity too?
As a person of faith, one of the most important spiritual
ideals my religion teaches is empathy: the ability to put one’s self in the
shoes of another person and by doing so to see life through their
experience. This is what I know. If I was talking to a Native American friend,
would I ever look them right in the eye and call them a “redskin” to their
face, especially if I knew it would insult them? Would you? I’d like to think not.
So why is it still ok to use language which so clearly is
experienced as harmful by others? It’s
not up to the government to solve this problem.
It is up to you and me and sports fans to be the ones who call for a
change. A large group of our fellow
neighbors and citizens asks that we as a society no longer use imagery or names
which they experience as racist and hurtful.
For me, it is that simple. It is that
clear.
What’s in a name? Everything.
No comments:
Post a Comment